Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomás Pueyo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:52, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tomás Pueyo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of Notability. People notable for only one event (article published at Medium). Criteria based on search engine statistics (of that article). Alexcalamaro (talk) 11:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Alexcalamaro (talk) 11:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think the subject surpasses the threshold for notability. HPLeu (talk) 13:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I am not sure how he meets the criteria of Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Any_biography. He meets not a single criterion on WP:ANYBIO. If we want to keep it, some justification beyond a personal opinion as above is required. Kolma8 (talk) 17:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Kolma8. Let's talk policies and facts. On Wikipedia, journalists and writers do not get notability from what they write, but from what others write about them in secondary sources; I see nothing here. For a supposed influencer, he has 0.132 Wheatons on Twitter; he's followed by 20 accounts of 5,000 that I follow. Bearian (talk) 02:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The relevant criteria are those of Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals. Criterium 1 is fulfilled by the number of interviews he has participated in and citations he has received, including from epidemiologists. Criterium 2 is fulfilled by the creation of the concept of the Hammer and the Dance, which has been quoted by several heads of states, referenced in scientific papers, and has over a million results on Google. Criterium 3 is met by the several articles published about him in outlets such as Forbes, Vanity Fair, or La Nueva España. User:WhyBerkeley (talk) 05:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC) — WhyBerkeley (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Attention: the user User:WhyBerkeley has been created for the sole purpose of posting this vote. Do not take it into consideration, and delete it please.81.202.238.193 (talk) 11:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article is obviously written by Pueyo himself. Total lack of notability and interest.81.202.238.193 (talk) 11:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is Tomás Pueyo. I was alerted about this conversation by a friend. I don't feel strongly about the outcome of this discussion or the page. Do as you think is right. It sounds to me like Kolma8's argument about looking at Wikipedia:Notability_(people) for criteria is the right thing to do, and it does look like Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals's factors are the ones adjusted to the situation. Other arguments seem anecdotal or ad hominem. I can provide my perspective if this is relevant, but I'm biased, don't have experience in these matters, and don't feel strongly anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbulises (talk • contribs) 22:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:28, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - textbook case of WP:BLP1E; does not meet any inclusion criteria for biographies Spiderone 13:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn;t passes WP:GNG Akronowner (talk) 11:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.